Fast forward to the 1994 Ottawa International Animation Festival.
It was my first Ottawa Festival experience. My classmates and I were at the festival for the weekend. We were sitting as a group in the balcony of the National Arts Centre, watching the Saturday night screening. The last competition film that night was 'The Wrong Trousers' and to say it was a crowd pleaser would be the understatement of the year. Each scene was filled with ingenious little visual puns as the master modelmakers at Aardman had created an entire universe appropriate to the characters. And at the climax of the film, the entire theatre roared with laughter and applause when Gromit grabbed the box of train tracks and built a new track in order to prevent he and Wallace from being derailed by the penguin.
Thus began my love for the films of Nick Park, and by extension, Aardman Animations. In the years since, I've tracked down Nick Park's 'A Grand Day Out' as well as the original 'Creature Comforts', watched some of the more obscure Aardman films like 'Adam', watched selected episodes of the 'Creature Comforts' t.v. series and 'Shaun the Sheep', and delighted to Aardman's feature length movies: 'Chicken Run', 'Curse of the Were-Rabbit' and 'Flushed Away'. I've even had the pleasure of visiting the Wallace and Gromit museum exhibit at M.I.T. around the time of the warehouse fire that consumed the rest of the Wallace and Gromit models and set pieces. Aardman reintroduced me to a world of stop-motion film that included everything from plasticine models to pixilation. To this day, I still cheer from the sidelines when Aardman breaks world records like the smallest and largest stop-motion animations produced to date. The largest animation being their short film 'Gulp', which can be viewed below.
And don't forget to watch the making of the film:
All the elements from Aardman's previous works were there: experienced voice actors, consistent character design and animation, a believable world filled with visual puns and gags, and a good selection of music that accentuated the emotional tone of the scenes, but it was that little spark of life that was missing. The story and dialogue just weren't up to the usual standard for an Aardman Animations film. This movie had the feel of a half-hour show that was stretched into an hour-and-a-half. I think what hit me hardest was the cardboard cut-out nature of the secondary characters. The Pirate Captain's crew members had no motivation, nothing to do, and no real reason to be there. From scene-to-scene, all they did was prop up the Captain for a few seconds and then fade right back into the background. Furthermore, the Queen's hatred for pirates was never explained. And the introduction of Charles Darwin almost halfway into the film stuck out like a sore thumb--although his chimp butler was very clever and did have some of the best gags in the film.
The only thing that I thought worthy of the Aardman moniker was the ingenious transition scenes where 2D characters sailed across an antique map, encountering trials and tribulations (and mermaids) on their way from place to place. They were cute and witty and left me looking forward to the next one whenever the main story started to drag.
Peter Lord has announced that a sequel to Pirates is in the works. I'm hoping that they will revisit what made the 'Wallace and Gromit' films (as well as 'Chicken Run') so successful and then apply those lessons/formulas to make Pirates 2 one of those rare examples where the sequel is even better than the original.
If I had to follow the Bill Plympton grading scale for feature length animated films (popularized on his blog "Scribble Junkies"), I'd say 'Pirates' was a B-/C+ -- a decent enough film for younger kids, but not enough to keep adults (or Aardman fanatics like myself) entertained for an hour-and-a-half.
